Drug repurposing screen identifies lonafarnib as respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein inhibitor.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of acute lower respiratory tract infection in infants, older adults and the immunocompromised. Effective directly acting antivirals are not yet available for clinical use. To address this, we screen the ReFRAME drug-repurposing library consisting of 12,000 small molecules against RSV. We identify 21 primary candidates including RSV F and N protein inhibitors, five HSP90 and four IMPDH inhibitors. We select lonafarnib, a licensed farnesyltransferase inhibitor, and phase III candidate for hepatitis delta virus (HDV) therapy, for further follow-up. Dose-response analyses and plaque assays confirm the antiviral activity (IC50: 10-118 nM). Passaging of RSV with lonafarnib selects for phenotypic resistance and fixation of mutations in the RSV fusion protein (T335I and T400A). Lentiviral pseudotypes programmed with variant RSV fusion proteins confirm that lonafarnib inhibits RSV cell entry and that these mutations confer lonafarnib resistance. Surface plasmon resonance reveals RSV fusion protein binding of lonafarnib and co-crystallography identifies the lonafarnib binding site within RSV F. Oral administration of lonafarnib dose-dependently reduces RSV virus load in a murine infection model using female mice. Collectively, this work provides an overview of RSV drug repurposing candidates and establishes lonafarnib as a bona fide fusion protein inhibitor.

Reverse inflammaging: Long-term effects of HCV cure on biological age.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can be cured with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). However, not all sequelae of chronic hepatitis C appear to be completely reversible after sustained virologic response (SVR). Recently, chronic viral infections have been shown to be associated with biological age acceleration defined by the epigenetic clock. The aim of this study was to investigate whether chronic HCV infection is associated with epigenetic changes and biological age acceleration and whether this is reversible after SVR. METHODS: We included 54 well-characterized individuals with chronic hepatitis C who achieved SVR after DAA therapy at three time points: DAA treatment initiation, end of treatment, and long-term follow-up (median 96 weeks after end of treatment). Genome-wide DNA methylation status was determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and used to calculate epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) using Horvath's clock. RESULTS: Individuals with HCV had an overall significant EAA of 3.12 years at baseline compared with -2.61 years in the age- and sex-matched reference group (p <0.00003). HCV elimination resulted in a significant long-term increase in DNA methylation dominated by hypermethylated CpGs in all patient groups. Accordingly, EAA decreased to 1.37 years at long-term follow-up. The decrease in EAA was significant only between the end of treatment and follow-up (p = 0.01). Interestingly, eight individuals who developed hepatocellular carcinoma after SVR had the highest EAA and showed no evidence of reversal after SVR. CONCLUSIONS: Our data contribute to the understanding of the biological impact of HCV elimination after DAA therapy and demonstrate that HCV elimination can lead to "reverse inflammaging". In addition, our data support the potential use of biological age as a biomarker for HCV sequelae after SVR. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Chronic hepatitis C virus infection is now curable with direct-acting antivirals, but it remains unclear whether hepatitis C sequelae are fully reversible after viral elimination. Our results suggest that epigenetic changes or acceleration of biological age are reversible in principle, but this requires time, while a lack of reversibility appears to be associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. While most clinical risk scores now take chronological age into account, it may be worthwhile to explore how biological age might improve these scores in the future. Biological age may be a cornerstone for the individualized clinical assessment of patients in the future, as it better reflects patients' lifestyle and environmental exposures over decades.

Impact of HBsAg and HBcrAg levels on phenotype and function of HBV-specific T cells in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific T cells are main effector cells in the control of HBV infection and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is suggested to be a critical factor in the impaired immune response, a hallmark of chronic HBV infection. In addition to HBsAg, other viral markers such as hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) are available, but their potential association with HBV-specific immune responses is not defined yet, which will be important if these markers are used for patient stratification for novel therapies aimed at functional HBV cure. DESIGN: We analysed T cell responses in 92 patients with hepatitis B e antigen negative chronic HBV infection with different HBsAg and HBcrAg levels. Overlapping peptides were used for in vitro response analyses (n=57), and HBV core18-specific and polymerase (pol)455-specific CD8+ T cells were assessed in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02 patients (n=35). In addition, in vitro responsiveness to anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) was investigated. RESULTS: HBV-specific T cell responses were not affected by HBsAg levels, but rather by age and CD4+ T cell responses were highest in patients with low HBcrAg levels. The phenotypes and functionality of HBV core18-specific and pol455-specific CD8+ T cells differed, but HBsAg and HBcrAg levels did not affect their profiles. Blocking with anti-PD-L1 could restore HBV-specific T cells, but the effect was significantly higher in T cells isolated from patients with low HBsAg and in particular low HBcrAg. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that age and HBcrAg rather than HBsAg, are associated with HBV-specific T cell responses. Finally, very low antigen levels indicated by HBsAg and in particular HBcrAg may influence T cell response to checkpoint inhibition.